Compared
A wide multi-channel feedback programme, against a focused survey tool you wire up yourself.
Survicate and Indie Polls both exist to ask your users a short question at a good moment and make the answer useful. The difference is how much ground each one covers, and what that breadth costs you in setup and in the shape of the bill.
Survicate's pitch is a programme rather than a tool. The same study can run on the website, in the product, in an email, behind a link and inside a mobile app; the answers land in a hub with AI topic and sentiment analysis over them; and native connectors push them into the CRM, analytics and support tools you already run. If your company has that stack and wants feedback flowing into it without an integration project, that is a real and well-executed argument. The mobile SDKs in particular are something Indie Polls does not have at all.
Indie Polls covers four of those surfaces and stops there: a hosted survey page with its own link, an embeddable widget in four shapes, the first question rendered inside an email you send from your own tool, and a shareable results page. What it spends the saved complexity on is the mechanics of asking: a response quota that closes the survey when you have enough and sends people to a page of your own, account-wide recontact spacing so nobody is asked twice inside a window you set, and a widget that can sit dormant until someone clicks your own button.
The integration philosophy is the second real difference, and it cuts both ways. Survicate maintains a catalogue of native connectors. Indie Polls ships Slack, Zapier and signed webhooks with a delivery log and retries, plus an MCP server so an assistant can read your surveys and results directly. That is fewer one-click integrations and more plumbing you control: better if you want the full response in your own database the second it is submitted, worse if what you wanted was a dropdown with your CRM's name on it.
The third is how you buy, and this one decides more shortlists than it should. Survicate is sold self-serve and sales-led both, with named tiers, seat counts and an Enterprise plan that starts with a call. Indie Polls has two plans on the pricing page, a seven-day trial of the upper one, and nobody to talk to. If your procurement expects a quote and a security review, that is a conversation Indie Polls is not set up to have.
Compared on the things that do not change every quarter. Both tools move their prices; read both pricing pages for those.
| Dimension | Survicate | Indie Polls |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A customer-feedback platform and research hub | A survey tool: one hosted page, one embeddable widget, one results view |
| Survey surfaces | Website, in-product, email, link and mobile apps | Hosted page and link, embeddable widget, and the first question inside your own email |
| Mobile apps | Native SDKs | None. A native mobile app is a genuine gap here |
| Widget shapes | Pop-ups, embeds and a feedback button | Slide-in, modal, banner or inline, and opening from your own button or link |
| Question types | A broad library with NPS, CSAT and CES | Ten, with NPS, CSAT, stars and Likert scored and charted automatically |
| Targeting | Audience, behaviour and event triggers | Domain, page path, visitor traits, device, and an event your page fires |
| Integrations | A large catalogue of native connectors, plus Zapier | Slack, Zapier, signed webhooks with a delivery log and retries, an MCP server, CSV |
| Reading the answers | Dashboards, with AI topic and sentiment analysis | Breakdowns by trait, AI themes over open text, every survey on one trend chart |
| Stopping at enough | Study scheduling and targeting | A response quota, then a redirect to a page of your own |
| How you buy | Self-serve tiers with seats, plus a sales-led Enterprise plan | Two plans on the pricing page, a seven-day trial, no sales call |
Survicate describes itself as a way to build a customer-feedback programme: surveys across the website, the product, email, a shared link and mobile apps, an AI research hub over the answers, and a long catalogue of native integrations.
Ten question types, a widget in four shapes, targeting by page, trait, device and event, and the analysis afterwards.
The honest first step is a channel audit, because it decides whether this move is possible at all. List where your Survicate studies actually run. If one of them is inside a mobile app, that study has nowhere to go here and the migration is partial by definition, so plan to leave it where it is rather than discovering the gap halfway through.
For the web studies the rebuild is quick, because the shapes map cleanly. A website survey becomes the widget as a slide-in, modal, banner or inline block; an email study becomes the email-embedded first question, which you paste into whatever you already send from; a link study becomes the hosted survey page, with its intro and outro screens and an optional name or email. URL and audience rules become the domain, path, trait, device and event rules on the embed.
Rebuild the connectors before you cut over, not after. Anything Survicate was pushing natively arrives here through Zapier or a signed webhook, and that is half an hour of work you want done and tested while the old surveys are still collecting. Response history does not transfer, so export what you have and keep it. The trend charts here start from the day you switch.
Seven days on Max, so nothing on this page is held back. No credit card required.
Want the whole list instead? Every feature, and the plan it comes on